Potrzebujemy Twojej pomocy!

Na stałe wspiera nas 477 czytelników i czytelniczek.

Niestety, minimalną stabilność działania uzyskamy dopiero przy 500 regularnych darczyńców. Dorzucisz się?

Przekaż 1,5%

Przekaż 1,5% podatku na Wolne Lektury KRS 00000 70056
Ufunduj darmowe książki dla tysięcy dzieciaków.
WIĘCEJ

Przypisy

Pierwsza litera: wszystkie | 0-9 | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z

Według typu: wszystkie | przypisy autorskie | przypisy redaktorów Wolnych Lektur | przypisy źródła

Według kwalifikatora: wszystkie

Według języka: wszystkie | English | français | Deutsch | lietuvių | polski


Znaleziono 1 przypis.

I am adducing these views not for any controversial purposes, but to justify and make clear why I stress certain general features of Trobriand Economic Sociology. My contentions might run the danger of appearing as gratuitous truisms if not thus justified. The opinion that primitive humanity and savages have no individual property is an old prejudice shared by many modern writers, especially in support of communistic theories, and the so-called materialistic view of history. The „communism of savages” is a phrase very often read, and needs no special quotation. The views of individual search for food and household economy are those of Karl Bűcher, and they have directly influenced all the best modern writings on Primitive Economics. Finally, the view that we have done with Primitive Economics if we have described the way in which the natives procure their food, is obviously a fundamental premise of all the naīve, evolutionary theories which construct the successive stages of economic development. This view is summarised in the following sentence : „…In many simple communities, the actual food quest, and operations immediately arising from it, occupy by far the greater part of the people's time and energy, leaving little opportunity for the satisfaction of any lesser needs”. This sentence, quoted out of „Notes and Queries on Anthropology”, p. 160, article on the Economics of the Social Group, represents what may be called the official view of contemporary Ethnology on the subject, and in perusing the rest of the article, it can be easily seen that all the manifold economic problems, with which we are dealing in this book, have been so far more or less neglected. [przypis redakcyjny]